|
16
April 2006
Carolyn L Roberts
Mark 16.1-8
Jesus
was crucified because he was seen as a threat to the Roman Empire.
Can you imagine? Can you imagine the Roman Empire being threatened
by a Jewish peasant? By someone who taught non-violence, who walked
in the ways of God's justice, who brought healing and hope to an
occupied nation chafing under the rule of an emperor who proclaimed
himself to be god. Of course, in the Jewish mind, the idea that
Caesar is God cannot be accommodated. There is but one God, the
Lord. And if the Lord is God and God's realm is ushered in with
Jesus, then the realm of Caesar no longer holds absolute power.
And that threat to Rome's power of coercion and intimidation could
not be tolerated. So Rome says "NO" as publically and
as brutally as it possibly can. It refuses to tolerate a direct
challenge to the hearts and minds of its subjects.
Using
state-sponsored terrorism to full effect, Jesus is put to death
in one of the most gruesome ways possible. That should be the end
of the story. The end of the Jewish peasant whose epithet on the
cross reads "King of the Jews." Polished off; dead; buried.
Certainly this is the message received, loud and clear by Mary Magdalene
and Mary, mother of James, and Salome. They are heading for the
tomb. Heading for that place in any culture where life is no more.
Heading to pay their last respects with horror and grief heavy in
their hearts. But what they find is not what they expect. They expect
a stone-they don't expect it to be moved. They expect a tomb-they
don't expect it to be empty. They expect death-they are told that
Jesus, this same Jesus whom they saw crucified before their very
eyes, has been raised from the dead. Then the man in the white robe
commissions these women to go, to tell Jesus' disciples and Peter
that he is going ahead of them to Galilee, where they will see him.
But
Mark does not end the story with that stirring, hope-filled commission
from the young man in white. And it unsettles us. It would be so
neat and tidy if the writer had done so. First, Mark tells us that
the women are afraid-terrorized. Association with those executed
for treason against the state is never a safe activity. Peter knows
that. His courtyard denial echoes through the centuries. But the
women cannot deny knowing Jesus-they are in his tomb. So in the
face of their commission, they run away in terror and amazement,
saying nothing to anyone. If we didn't know better, we'd think that
the two Marys and Salome were twentieth century, mainline Protestants.
You know what I mean. The folks who think that it's somehow impolite
or rude to talk about our faith. The folks who think that faith
is an internal matter between the individual and God, relegated
only to private devotional practices and public acts of charity.[1,x]
"Translated
directly from the Greek, the last (inelegant) sentence of Mark's
gospel reads...: '...and no one anything they told, they were afraid
for...".[2,43] It's the granddaddy of all cliffhangers. There's
a student who memorizes the entire gospel according to Mark so that
he can give a Broadway-style reading before a live audience. He
chooses the cliffhanger ending. But at his first performance, he
ends, then stands there awkwardly, shifting from one foot to the
other, the audience waiting for more, for closure. After several
anxious seconds, he says, "Amen!" and makes his exit.
The audience is relieved. It applauds loudly and appreciatively.
But the student recognizes his betrayal of the text. So the next
performance, when he reaches the final verse, he simply pauses for
half a beat and leaves the stage in silence.[3,19] The audience
buzzes in conversation about the non-ending long after the applause
has faded.
By
staying true to the gospel, the student undergirds Mark's thrust.
It is no longer the women who bear the burden of the commission,
it is we hearers of the story. Will we make it into yet another
tale of those raised from the dead, tales such as those of the only
son of the widow of Zaraphath (1 Kings 17) or Jesus' good friend
Lazarus? Surely these stories strike a blow at mortality. But Harvey
Cox points out that restoring a crucified man to life does more
than strike a blow at mortality; it strikes a blow at the system
that executes him.[4] The message resonates even more deeply: this
God, whose realm is of this world says "YES" to Jesus
and "NO" to the powers that killed him.[5,197] This God
is the God of justice, who vindicates "the victims of the callous
and the powerful."[5,197] This God is not cowed by all the
might Rome can muster. This God is the Lord, who rages against systems
of injustice that brutalize the innocent. This God is not so neatly
finished off with the period of capital punishment. This God takes
the period of death and adds the neat little tail that becomes the
comma of possibility: you will see him-back in Galilee, back where
the gospel begins, back where once again you are on the Way that
inaugurates the realm of God.
This
is the meaning of that empty tomb, the meaning of Easter. For all
their life-denying possibilities, the powers of empire ultimately
are no match for the power of our living, still-speaking God. We
too have received the commission. The choice is ours. Will we choose
to be members of the new community, returning to Galilee to follow
Jesus? Or will we run away, back to the world the way it was? Will
we say 'yes' to our still-speaking God?
***
[1]
Diana Butler Bass, Foreward, Tell it Like it is, by Lillian Daniel,
The Alban Insititute, ©2006.
[2] Barbara Brown Taylor, "Preaching Easter," Journal
for Preachers, Easter 2006, Volume XXIX Number 3, pages 42-46.
[3] Thomas G. Long, "Dangling Gospel," Christian Century,
April 4, 2006.
[4] Referenced by Barbara Brown Taylor, "Preaching Easter,"
Journal for Preachers, Easter 2006, Volume XXIX Number 3, pages
42-46. Harvey Cox, When Jesus Came to Harvard: Making Moral Choices
Today (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004), 274.
[5] Borg, Marcus J. and John Dominic Crossan, The Last Week, HarperSanFrancisco,
©2006.
|