8
January 2006
Carolyn L Roberts
Mark
1.1-13
I don't know about the rest of you, but John and I are barely
on the other side of the twelfth day of Christmas. Like those
who celebrate the "Little Christmas" of Epiphany, we
leave our tree and decorations up till the Twelfth Night is past.
Those twelve days of Christmas-the 26th of December through the
6th of January, traditionally celebrated as the one on which the
magi arrive, together with the season of Advent, create a churchly
season almost equal in length to that of Lent's 40 days before
Easter.
Small
wonder, then, that when that season moushes with the unabashed
commercialism of the "holiday season," we are noticeably
stretched, often stressed, and frequently relieved to be on this
side of Advent/Christmas/Epiphany/the New Year. And we are ever-so-grateful
that the gods of the Superbowl do not demand their obeisance for
nearly another month!
Nevertheless,
it is with no small amount of ambivalence that we hear the scripture
which confronts us this morning. It is no babe in a feeding trough,
no infant receiving gifts from foreigners, no child confounding
elders in the temple, but a fully-grown man who responds to the
prophetic call of John the Baptizer. John the Baptizer is making
the case that the realm of Caesar is not the realm of the Lord.
He is making the case that to live as Caesar's subjects is not
Israel's true destiny any more than it was Israel's calling to
provide bricks for Pharoah.[1,23] Embedded within that appeal
to cultic memory, John calls for repentance. He calls for a turning
of hearts and minds away from current thinking and practices,
away from what Walter Brueggemann calls our 'script.' Our script
is both large and small-large in its vocabulary of 'free enterprise'
and 'great frontiers,' small in its vocabulary of 'we do it this
way,' or 'my mom always.' A prophet offers a way of detaching
from the script, and John is a prophet. He offers baptism as a
way of ritually detaching from the script of two cultures-the
Roman culture of oppression and subjugation; and the temple culture
bound up in oppressive purity codes. Jesus comes to the Jordan
River, apparently as one of John's disciples, and is baptized.
And
then it happens. Jesus' baptism becomes an "Aha! moment,"
an epiphany, a stunning insight into God's claim upon him. Jesus
knows who he is by means of that manifestation. Incidentally,
in Mark's version, Jesus' epiphany isn't publically witnessed
or verified. No one other than Jesus experiences that epiphany,
any more than observers see the love that manifests itself in
a wedding.
That's only the beginning. Jesus is so charged by his baptism
that it drives him into the wilderness, where he wrestles with
what it means to be God's beloved for 'forty days'-a long time.
Marcus Borg describes Jesus as a "God-intoxicated Jew."
When someone is intoxicated, they aren't in complete control of
their facilities. When someone is intoxicated by God, it is God's
Spirit which is in control.
As
Jesus' disciples, we begin with baptism. It doesn't matter if
we are sprinkled, dipped, mopped, or dunked. There is no more
"right" way to baptize or be baptized than there is
a correct bread to break and eat at communion. There is no "right"
time to baptize. Nor are the baptisms of some persons or traditions
more valid than others. The fact is, our squabbles over any of
these Christian fine points is a diversion, a way in which we
move our focus from the foundational claims of the gospel, and
undermine the force of the text. Simply put, regardless of which
approach is most appealing to our sensibilities, baptism is fundamentally
our point of entry into the counter-script which nearly always
sets us apart from our culture. In Brueggemann's analysis, our
contemporary script dominates both self and community in our society,
liberals and conservatives alike. He calls it the script of therapeutic,
technological, consumerist militarism which holds out the (false)
promise of security and happiness. The church's task of de-scripting
takes form in our intentional articulation of an alternative script
that we testify will indeed make us safe and joyous.
Our
script begins with questions. We ask, "do you promise to
be Christ's disciple, to follow in the way of our Savior, to resist
oppression and evil, to show love and justice?" By inference,
we are asking, will you follow the dominant script of our culture?
Or the elusive counterscript of discipleship? But we do not define
discipleship. Or the precise way of our Savior. We simply welcome
people into the community of faith and tell our story in word
and in deed.
Gregory
Tolle tells of a pastor who moved to a new parish. One of her
members came by one morning and asks if he can give the pastor
a tour of the community. She jumps at the chance, and it isn't
long before they are off in the man's pickup.
Soon
after they start, the man pulls into a four-way stop. Most Eastern
rural towns have one of these intersections. Till I moved here-good
Westerner that I am-I'd never heard of the 'town square', but
you all know what that is. It's the hub of the town. In this instance,
there is a bar on one corner, the bank on another, a convenience
store on the third, and the fourth is an empty building. The man
stops the truck, and gently places his thumb on his forehead,
whispering, "Been baptized."
Several
blocks later, he pulls over at an old house and invites the preach
to join him. The two eventually are greeted by an elderly woman
who gives the driver a big hug and a smile. The man introduces
the woman as a "saint," then once again touches his
forehead and whispers, "Been baptized." The three visit,
then leave, ending the tour when the driver asks the preacher
if she would like a soft drink.
They
pull up to the convenience story, and as soon as they are out
of the truck, another man approaches the driver, wagging a finger
in his face and complaining about community problems. The more
he talks, the louder he gets. And once again, the driver puts
his thumb on his forehead and mumbles under his breath, "Been
baptized." Then the preacher and the driver buy their soft
drinks and return to the church.
Of
course, the preacher can't stand it. She has to know. So she asks,
"I hate to pry, but I can't help noticing that several times
today you touched your forehead and mumble something under your
breath. Why?"
The
driver breaks out in a grin. "It's been several years since
I came to know and love God. It took me a while to understand
how much God loves and forgives me. A few years ago, I went before
the church and asked that they forgive me and accept me into their
family. The next day, I went around and told all my friends, and
even my enemies, that now I was a Christian-that because of God's
love for me, I was going to serve God in all I did."
"I
touched my forehead and whispered 'Been baptized' at the four-way
stop because the bar had been my church, and the bank was where
all my work and effort went. I did the same when we stopped at
Miss Hazel's because she was the first person to welcome me into
the family of faith. And I did the same thing when Jones confronted
me at the store because it reminds me of who I really am: a beloved
child of God. I've been baptized. My old ways are gone. I must
try to be Christ-like in all that I do. This is the way to live
out my call."[2]
Howard's
baptism gives him an alternative script. So does yours. So does
mine.
***
[1] Walter Brueggemann, "Living with the elusive God: Counterscript,"
The Christian Century, November 29, 2005, Vol. 122, No. 24, pages
22-28.
[2] Gregory L. Tolle, Lectionary Tales for the pulpit, Series
IV, Cycle A, CSS Publishing Company, ©2004, pages 31-32.